Skip to main content

Positions

Policy Catalogue

Version
Version 0.2
Date
Framework
European Integral Restorationism
Entries
89

This catalogue answers a narrow question: what does Restore Europe hold on this issue? It does not replace the manifesto. The manifesto sets out the worldview; this sets out searchable, topic-by-topic positions.

Where Catholic moral teaching is clear, Restore Europe generally adopts it as the moral baseline, and states civil-law implementation separately. One departure is recorded explicitly: on capital punishment Restore Europe takes the older traditional allowance for exceptional cases rather than the contemporary abolitionist position.

The catalogue distinguishes the constitutional order Restore Europe seeks from European law as it currently stands. Several positions — on nationality, on deprivation of citizenship, on speech, on the public standing of religion and on capital punishment — would require constitutional or treaty change before they could be enacted in particular European states. Where that is so, the entry says it.

Version 0.2 settles the questions version 0.1 had left open: the European institutional relationship, asylum, deportation, wages, taxation, pensions, housing, labour representation, digital identity and currency, biometric surveillance, genetic engineering, sentencing, the energy mix and every standing question of foreign policy. Where a v0.2 formulation revised an earlier entry, the newer text governs.

Every question in this catalogue carries a position. Entries marked Derived follow the direction of the manifesto without their implementation being fixed, and several name the legal or treaty change they would require. Positions are revised as the movement decides; the version and date above say which text you are reading.

Status legend

Manifesto Core
Explicitly established by the Manifesto of European Integral Restorationism.
Agreed Policy
A position specified for this catalogue after the manifesto was written.
Derived
Strongly implied by the manifesto or by an agreed position, but the implementation is not settled.
Open
No position has been adopted.

7 of 89 positions match.

IV

Economy, Property, Finance and Work

Ownership, enterprise, credit and the dignity of labour.

  • DerivedEconomy, Property, Finance and Work

    Detailed Housing Restrictions

    Housing should principally serve habitation and community, with policy aimed at widespread family ownership rather than permanent financial extraction.

V

Technology, AI and Human-Scale Life

What may be built, what should be deployed, and what must remain within reach.

  • DerivedTechnology, AI and Human-Scale Life

    Facial Recognition

    Permanent or indiscriminate facial-recognition surveillance of the general population should be prohibited.

IX

Environment, Land and Settlement

Stewardship of an inheritance that was not made by us.

  • DerivedEnvironment, Land and Settlement

    Energy Policy: General Doctrine

    Energy policy should be judged by reliability, strategic resilience, affordability, environmental stewardship and long-term human welfare rather than loyalty to one technology.

  • DerivedEnvironment, Land and Settlement

    Nuclear Energy

    Nuclear power may be permitted and supported where it is safe, reliable, strategically useful and environmentally responsible.

  • DerivedEnvironment, Land and Settlement

    Fossil Fuels

    Fossil fuels should not be prohibited ideologically irrespective of their strategic or economic function, but unnecessary pollution and avoidable dependency should be reduced.

  • DerivedEnvironment, Land and Settlement

    Renewable Energy

    Renewable energy should be supported where technically sound, economically reasonable and compatible with landscapes, communities and grid reliability.

  • DerivedEnvironment, Land and Settlement

    Climate Policy

    Environmental stewardship includes prudent climate mitigation and adaptation, but climate policy does not justify unlimited centralized control or policies that impose disproportionate hardship for negligible benefit.