Surveillance
Citizens should retain meaningful private spaces free from permanent surveillance, with the detailed rules not yet settled.
Policy catalogueTechnology, AI and Human-Scale Life
DerivedPermanent or indiscriminate facial-recognition surveillance of the general population should be prohibited.
Facial recognition may have narrow legitimate uses for serious criminal investigations, but public space should not become a permanently monitored biometric environment.
Implementation note
The manifesto does not name facial recognition, but expressly protects meaningful private spaces free from permanent surveillance.
Last updated .
Citizens should retain meaningful private spaces free from permanent surveillance, with the detailed rules not yet settled.
Indiscriminate permanent retention of the communications metadata of the entire population should be rejected.
Digital identification may exist as an optional convenience, but ordinary civic participation must not require compulsory digital-only identity.
Technological development is not synonymous with human progress, and should be judged by its effects on autonomy, family, community and work.
Every question in this catalogue carries a position. Entries marked Derived follow the direction of the manifesto without their implementation being fixed, and several name the legal or treaty change they would require. Positions are revised as the movement decides; the version and date above say which text you are reading.