Housing and Financialization
Housing should principally serve habitation and community rather than function as an endlessly appreciating financial asset.
Policy catalogueEconomy, Property, Finance and Work
DerivedHousing should principally serve habitation and community, with policy aimed at widespread family ownership rather than permanent financial extraction.
Private property is protected, while proportionate restrictions may address practices that turn scarce housing into a vehicle for artificial scarcity, monopoly or speculative accumulation.
Implementation note
The manifesto already states that housing should serve habitation and community rather than function principally as an appreciating financial asset. Detailed restrictions should be calibrated nationally and locally.
Last updated .
Housing should principally serve habitation and community rather than function as an endlessly appreciating financial asset.
Property is a source of independence and responsibility. The answer to concentration is wider ownership, not the abolition of property.
Public architecture should respect human scale, local materials and regional tradition, and historic fabric should be preserved wherever reasonably possible.
Taxation is legitimate for the common good but should be fair, family-sensitive, non-confiscatory and compatible with broad ownership, productive work and subsidiarity.
Every question in this catalogue carries a position. Entries marked Derived follow the direction of the manifesto without their implementation being fixed, and several name the legal or treaty change they would require. Positions are revised as the movement decides; the version and date above say which text you are reading.